Ex-CCP Exec Says Globalization Has Ill Effects on Culture

Cultural worker, actor and art activist Fernando “Nanding” Josef talks about globalization and cultural imperialism. He insists that both are detrimental to the indigenous arts and culture of the Filipinos.

BY NOEL SALES BARCELONA
Correspondent
Bulatlat
CULTURE

For Fernando “Nanding” Josef, former vice president and artistic director of the Cultural Center of the Philippines (CCP), globalization has adversely affected the development of local arts and culture.

Josef resigned last year from his leadership posts at the CCP in support of Rodolfo “Jun” Lozada Jr., one of the star witnesses to the controversial National Broadband Network (NBN) deal between the Philippine government and China’s Zhong Xing Telecommunication Equipment Company Limited (ZTE). The said project was marred by allegations of under-the-table deals.

Globalization disempowering poor nations

In an interview on Jan. 31 at the CCP grounds, Josef said that globalization has empowered the already powerful countries, while disempowering the underdeveloped nations such as the Philippines.

Isang masamang aspect ng globalization ay y’ong negative effect sa maliliit na bansa. Parang sa globalization, mas nagbigyan, o na-empower lalo ang mga powerful countries. Maski doon sa economic aspect of globalization, laging talung-talo ang mga mahihirap na bansa” (One of the negative aspects of globalization is its ill-effect on small countries. Under globalization, it seems, the powerful countries became more empowered. Even in the economic aspect of globalization, the smaller countries always lose), he said.

Globalization kills local culture

So doon sa aspect na ‘yon, mayroong ill-effect ang globalization pati na rin sa kultura, I think. Kasi, parang iyong phenomenon ng globalization, nawalan ng safety measures to protect the indigenous cultures of the different countries. Parang naging open, na-dilute yata, hanggang ngayon, I think, nadi-dilute ang cultural values ng iba’t ibang bansa, napapasukan ng mga values that are too Westernized”(On that aspect, globalization has an ill-effect also on [the local] culture. Because, it seems, in the phenomenon of globalization, the safety measures to protect the indigenous cultures of the different countries are lost. And the cultural values of the different countries, I think, are being—and continuously being—diluted, and becoming influenced by cultures that are too Westernized), he explained.

Thus, he said, the indigenous cultures have become endangered.

However, globalization had its positive effects as well, he said.

Mayroong mga advantage [ang globalization], in a sense that na yung mga bansa naman na may common grievances, nagkakaalaman na pare-pareho ang plights natin at I think, that also motivates them to come together and empower themselves [to counter the negative effects of globalization]” (There are advantages [in globalization], in a sense that the countries which have common grievances consult each other and share their experiences, and that motivates them to come together to empower themselves to counter the negative effects of globalization), he furthered.

Cultural imperialism: fruit of neoliberal globalization

Josef also assailed cultural imperialism.

Herbert Schiller (Nov. 5, 1919 – Jan. 29, 2000), an American media critic, sociologist, author and scholar, defined cultural imperialism as “the sum of the processes by which a society is brought into the modern world system, and how its dominating stratum is attracted, pressured, forced and sometimes bribed into shaping social institutions to correspond to or even to promote the values and structures of the dominant center of the system.”

Schiller said the US is the number one promoter of this practice. Its motivation, says Schiller, is the US desire for access to foreign markets and the belief in the superiority of American culture.

Ay, naku! Nakikialam ka, pinakikialaman mo y’ong kultura ng may kultura at ipinapasok mo y’ong sarili mong kultura” (Cultural imperialism is meddling in another country’s cultural affairs and imposing one’s own culture), Josef said when asked for his own definition of cultural imperialism.

He said cultural imperialists boast that their culture is superior to other cultures to lead other nations into setting aside their own cultures and accept foreign ones in their stead. (Bulatlat.com)

Share This Post

One Comment - Write a Comment

  1. ok ang lathalain mo sir/mam pro mam wag na globalization ang gamitin mo na salita imperyalismo nlng,free trade,leassi fare plolicy or wat ever iisa lng pinaganda lng ng mga taga bandera ng imperyo yan ganun din yan imperyalismo or globalization halimaw ang muka niyan,kita nmn epoka na ng kasaysayan ang nagsasabi diba? kung titingnan mo ang superstructure ng society ntn unawa mo bakit ganun at bakit ganyan,pro pano yung iba na di alam ang superstructure ng isang society diba?well we point it ha, politics,economics,culture,military at ugnayang panlabas jan nlng makikita diba?ang labo ng mga termino mo,cultural imperialism anu yun,natural kung ano sistemang nag-eexist ayun ang kultura,we are in era of post modernism diba?pro wla nmn permanente na kultura eh,kyang baguhin yan,example ang great proletarian cultural revolution s china namangha ang mundo duon,kakayanin kya sabi ng buong mundo,so ayun kinaya pro natalo din,pro nakunan ng aral yun diba?sa tgal na epoka ng kapitalismo na ito at inabot pa ntn,so sbi ni Mao Tse Tung nangangailangan ng 5-10 generation pr mawala ang treat ng restoration ng kapitalismo s mga sosyalistang basta, kya unawang unawa ng mga student ko ang Cultural revolution s china.oo nga binago mo ang political,economical at cultural aspect ng lipunan wag mo kaligtaan na baguhin din ang values at takbo ng isip ng tao dhil bitbit pa nila ang lumang kaayusan sa isip nila, alisin mo s isip nila ang salitang "AKIN" at dapat mapalitan ito ng salitang "ATIN"

    well atleast nakaranas nmn ang 1/3 ng population ng mundo s sosyalistang lipunan at sistema,kung kinaya na malangoy ang pangpang ng socialistang kaayusan so it means kaya nadin maabot ang kaayusan nito,duon lamang malilinang ang kultura na wla ng exploitation ang tao sa tao, malalim no pro ako nakita ko yun s theory at praktis malinaw ang mga batayan at nagsasalita ang realidad tlga.

Comments are closed.