This story
was taken from Bulatlat, the Philippines's alternative weekly
newsmagazine (www.bulatlat.com, www.bulatlat.net, www.bulatlat.org).
Vol. VI, No. 5, March 5-11, 2006
Analysis
A Test for
Democracy
The Arroyo administration has a
recipe for dictatorship – calibrated pre-emptive response, Executive Order No.
464, the proposed amendments to the 1987 Constitution and the Anti-Terrorism
Bill pending before Congress. Proclamation No. 1017 was a test case. The
declaration of the state of emergency shows what President Arroyo is capable
of.
BY BENJIE OLIVEROS When President
Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo issued Proclamation No. 1017 placing the country under a
“state of national emergency,” she drew a lot of flak from different sectors of
society. Some called it an act of desperation to silence her critics. Others
called it an act of betrayal to the spirit of EDSA coming as it is on the 20th
commemoration of People Power 1, when the Filipino people toppled a
dictatorship. It has been also called an attempt to impose martial law once
more. Proclamation
No. 1017 itself was vague. Lawyers said it was merely a description of a
situation. It referred to a conspiracy of “some elements of the political
opposition with the extreme left, represented by the NDF-CPP-NPA and the extreme
right, represented by the military adventurists,” who seek to bring down the
government…is hindering the growth of the economy and
sabotaging the people's confidence in government and their faith in the future
of this country.” It also mentioned that “the claims of these elements have been
recklessly magnified by certain segments of the national media.” It ended with
President Arroyo calling on the Armed Forces of the
Philippines “to
maintain law and order throughout the Philippines, prevent or suppress all forms
of lawless violence as well any act of insurrection or rebellion and to enforce
obedience to all the laws and to all decrees, orders and regulations promulgated
by (Arroyo) personally or upon (her) direction.”
Even as the
government was hard put at explaining that it merely intended to save the
republic from the “unholy alliance” of the left and the right, nobody seemed to
believe it. The Arroyo administration immediately cancelled all EDSA
celebrations and rally permits issued for February 24. Consequently, it
attempted to disperse all rallies on that day even if these were conducted
peacefully. To lend
credence to the administration’s claims, it immediately arrested former
Philippine Constabulary Chief Ramon Montaño and Anakpawis (Toiling Masses)
Party-list Rep. Crispin Beltran. It also tried to arrest Bayan Muna (People
First) Rep. Satur Ocampo, Teddy Casino and Joel Virador; Anakpawis
Representative Rafael Mariano and Gabriela Women’s Party Rep. Liza Maza who are
all now under the “protective custody” (read: detention) of the House of
Representatives. The Philippine
National Police (PNP) raided the printing press and office of the The Daily
Tribune and stationed soldiers to guard Channels 2 and 7. Subsequently,
it filed a case of rebellion against 15 people including those mentioned above,
Magdalo officers, and other personalities associated with Bayan Muna. It came
out with a list of 50 persons it accused of being connected with the
CPP-NPA-NDFP with pending arrest warrants. PNP Director
General Arturo Lomibao also issued a warning against media agencies to abide by
a set of guidelines to be issued by the PNP. He warned that the police would be
monitoring media broadcast and publications and would not hesitate to take over
media agencies that violate these guidelines. The selection
of targets of the Arroyo administration revealed its intention to silence its
most consistent critics. The legal left proves to be a thorn on the side of the
administration. But its proposition that the legal and underground left are the
same is both absurd and dangerous. This is the very reason for the killing of
leaders and members of progressive party-list groups in areas outside the
National Capital Region (NCR). The legal left
was a convenient scapegoat, a warning sample and a test case. With the arrest
of individuals identified with the left, the Arroyo administration thought that
it had proven its conspiracy theory; and it had sent a signal to its critics
that it would not tolerate dissent. The Arroyo
administration tried to gauge the reaction of the public to these arrests. It
did not arrest former President Cory Aquino, although it warned that it would
arrest her if she joined the rally last February 24. It also did not arrest
former Vice-President Teofisto Guingona and other personalities of the
opposition for it would have projected an image that it was similar to the
Marcos dictatorship, which might not sit well with the general public.
The case of
The Daily Tribune was likewise the same. It served as a warning sample and a
test case. There were also reports that all television programs of Bro. Eddie
Villanueva of Bangon (Rise up) and the award-winning radio program Ngayon Na,
Bayan! (Now, People!) of Kodao Productions were taken off the air. It did
not raid the big ones such as the Philippine Daily Inquirer. It also did
not close down all media agencies like Marcos did since doing so could backfire
on the Arroyo administration. But the manner
by which the raids and arrests were made indicated that the Arroyo
administration is capable of running roughshod over civil liberties and the
people’s rights. Although there was no suspension of the writ of habeas
corpus, the arrests were made on the basis of old or trumped-up cases. New
charges of sedition and rebellion were subsequently filed in court. But these
did not pass the proper procedure of preliminary investigation to determine
probable cause. It was a case of “arrest first, seek evidence later.” The Arroyo
administration has lifted the state of national emergency a week after declaring
it. The business community and foreign investors, including the American Chamber
of Commerce, were persistent in their call for its lifting saying that the
proclamation is bad for business. Likewise, Proclamation No. 1017 generated
protests from a broad sector of people, including those in government such as
the Senate and its employees. However, the
Arroyo administration, through Department of Justice (DOJ) Secretary Raul
Gonzales, announced that the guidelines for media coverage will still be
enforced and that they will continue monitoring the media. It is preparing
charges of inciting to sedition against Tribune publisher Niñez Cacho-Olivares
and columnists Ike Señeres and Herman Tiu-Laurel. Also, it had
already made a mockery of the justice system by its policy of “arrest first,
seek evidence later”. It is expected that the government will still use this
illegal method as Executive Secretary Eduardo Ermita admitted that the
“crackdown” on government opponents and critics will continue even after the
lifting of Proclamation No. 1017. It has its
calibrated pre-emptive response and Executive Order No. 464 in place. Its
proposed amendments to the 1987 Constitution and its Anti-Terrorism Bill pending
before Congress will further constrict civil liberties and people’s rights. Its
recipe for a dictatorship is ready and the mechanisms are being put in place.
The only
obstacle to the Arroyo administration’s plans of imposing its will is the
people’s dissent. Proclamation No. 1017 could have been harsher, been imposed
longer, and it could have been a formal declaration of martial law had the
Arroyo administration not fear the people’s reaction. The Arroyo administration
was right to hesitate. The initial
reaction of the different groups holding a rally when Proclamation No. 1017 was
announced was not to call off its activities but to assert the freedom of
assembly by converging at Ayala. The reaction
of the party-list representatives being hunted down by government was not to go
into hiding but to assert their rights. The raid at
The Daily Tribune and the warnings of the PNP did not deter media from doing
its coverage. Media people gathered at Newsdesk Café on February 26 to render a
collective voice against these attacks on press freedom. Proclamation
No. 1017 was not able to successfully generate a “chilling effect” as intended
by the government. Rather it galvanized the people into action. In this
respect, People Power 1 or EDSA 1 was not a total failure. The militant
reactions to Proclamation No. 1017 and the collective shouts of “Never Again to
Martial Law” manifested the most valuable lesson and gain of People Power 1.
But all
freedom-loving Filipinos must not stop even as Proclamation No. 1017 was lifted. The
declaration of the state of emergency shows what President Arroyo is capable
of. Currently, its spin doctors are continuously raising the coup bogey and it
warned that it may again declare a state of national emergency anytime. To confront
this continuing challenge to civil liberties and people’s rights, freedom-loving
Filipinos must be able to collectively show its will and muster its capabilities
to fight for democracy and effect genuine change. Bulatlat © 2006 Bulatlat
■
Alipato Publications Permission is granted to reprint or redistribute this article, provided its author/s and Bulatlat are properly credited and notified.
Bulatlat