This story
was taken from Bulatlat, the Philippines's alternative weekly
newsmagazine (www.bulatlat.com, www.bulatlat.net, www.bulatlat.org).
Vol. VI, No. 4, February 26 - March 4, 2006
Media Converge vs.
Proclamation 1017 “The
freedom of expression is perhaps one of the most important freedoms we enjoy in
a democracy. When this is lost, all other rights and freedoms go...Thirty years
ago we lost this freedom…Today we are facing again the danger of losing this
freedom…I think we should all join together and resist this attempt to restrict
this freedom with all our strength and all our might,” said Isagani Yambot of
the Philippine Daily Inquirer in a press conference cum forum sponsored by the
National Union of Journalists in the Philippines February 26, 11:00 am at the
Newsdesk, Quezon City. BY
BENJIE OLIVEROS The activity at the
Newsdesk, at Sct. Tobias corner Sct. Madrinan, Quezon City, Sunday,
February 26 seems like a typical press conference. There was a panel of
speakers composed by Carlos Conde, Secretary General of the National
Union of Journalists in the Philippines (NUJP), Dean Luis Teodoro,
board member of the Center for People’s Governance (CENPEG),
columnist of Business Mirror and professor at the College of Mass
Communications of the University of the Philippines, Manuel Luis Quezon
III, columnist of the Philippine Daily Inquirer (PDI), Leah Navarro, artist, Carl Wilson,
chair of the Foreign Correspondents
Association of the Phippines (FOCAP), and Jose Cosido, national
president of the College Editors Guild of the Philippines (CEGP). Covering the activity are
media persons from almost all television and radio networks, broadsheets, and
tabloids. As the panel of speakers spoke to assail President Gloria-Macapagal
Arroyo’s Proclamation 1017 placing the whole country in a state of national
emergency, reporters took notes and switched on their recorders,
photojournalists took shots, and television cameras took footages. Also present were known
columnists such as Conrad de Quiros and Isagani Yambot of the PDI. The heads and
representatives of all types of media organizations and centers were also there,
including the Philippine Center for Photojournalism. But there were no
competition among the networks. There was no elbowing and jockeying for position
to get the best shot or coverage. And there was no clear distinction between
interviewees and interviewers. At the question and answer portion, there were
no questions thrown at the speakers just expressions of concern, opinions,
suggestions, agreements, and calls to action. Cameras shifted around as media
persons from all corners of the room spoke. Carlos Conde clarified the
position of NUJP regarding the proclamation and enumerated the alarming
incidents indicating an attack on media such as the raid at Tribune, casing of
publications, deployment of troops at TV stations, and unconfirmed reports of
surveillance directed at journalists such as Arnold Clavio. He called on their
colleagues in the media to take a stand on the issue of Proclamation 1017. Dean Luis Teodoro belied
the Arroyo administration’s claims that the state of emergency is nothing more
than a description of what is going on. Teodoro called it as an “assault on the
free press” . Manuel Luis Quezon said
that the mere fact that the wording of Proclamation 1017 of President Arroyo was
lifted word for word from Proclamation 1081of former President Ferdinand Marcos
when he declared martial law already reveals the intent of the current
administration. “This is the beginning of the systematic intimidation of media
as in martial law days. We have to stop this before it reaches fruition,” said
Quezon. “What next? The internet?
Censorship?” ,said Leah Navarro, “Are we going back to the time when we have to
cower in fear?” Leah Navarro asked. Ricky Carandang of ANC
warned media people of other threats not as overt as raids and arrests. He
identified threats such as advertising boycotts and libel suits. The media persons present
also questioned the basis of the standards to be set by the police as reportedly
mentioned by Philippine National Police Director Gen. Arturo Lomibao.
“What right have they? Are
they profesionally competent to do this? We the media demand that we set the
standards for ourselves,” said Isagani Yambot of PDI. Conrad de Quiros of PDI
stressed the need to act quickly. Yambot of PDI summed up the
concerns, opinions, and analysis expressed by the media persons present when he
said, “The freedom of expression is perhaps one of the most important freedoms
we enjoy in a democracy. When this is lost, all other rights and freedoms
go...Thirty years ago we lost this freedom…Today we are facing again the danger
of losing this freedom…I think we should all join together and resist this
attempt to restrict this freedom with all our strength and all our might.” While everybody agreed that
their most effective weapon against attacks on the free press is to adhere to
the highest standards of journalism and to do what they do best, reporting what
they see, they also agreed to come up with both defensive and offensive
measures. The media persons and
organizations agreed to exchange contact numbers and set up a center of
communications that will monitor attacks on the media and mobilize them in cases
when a colleague needs support. The NUJP offered its office as a center. They
also agreed to start setting up a network. They identified lawyers
groups who are willing to provide legal assistance to journalists who are being
arrested and media agencies being raided. The media persons present
agreed to draft a resolution demanding from the Arroyo government the immediate
withdrawal of Proclamation 1017 and to stop all forms of media harassment.
They also agreed to come
up with a pooled editorial. They will convince their editors to publish it on
the front pages of their publications. “There are already
transgressions on press freedom…If we don’t do something about the Tribune
situation and the arrest of people, tayo na ang susunod. (We may be next). I
remember a quotation, when they came for the communists, I did not speak up
because I was not a communist. We they came for the trade unionists, I did not
speak up because I was not a trade unionist. When they came for the Jews, I did
not speak up because I was not a Jew. When they came for me, there was no one
to speak for me. We have to demand for certain things such as the withdrawal of
Proclamation 1017 now,” said Conrad de Quiros. Bulatlat © 2006 Bulatlat
■
Alipato Publications Permission is granted to reprint or redistribute this article, provided its author/s and Bulatlat are properly credited and notified.
Bulatlat