This story
was taken from Bulatlat, the Philippines's alternative weekly
newsmagazine (www.bulatlat.com).
Vol. VI, No. 39,
Nov. 5-11, 2006
STREETWISE
Indicting the Arroyo Regime
The
PPT Second Session indictment shows that the Philippines has not substantially
moved away from political repression and military abuse despite the ouster of a
military-backed, U.S.-propped dictatorship nor has it broken free of its
neocolonial status despite loud proclamations of being an independent and
democratic republic.
By Carol Pagaduan-Araullo
BusinessWorld
Posted by Bulatlat
In simple rites held under historically significant circumstances, the Permanent
Peoples' Tribunal: Second Session on the Philippines was convened in The Hague,
the Netherlands last October 30, upon the appeal of Philippine human rights and
people's organizations. The first session on the Philippines held twenty six
years ago in 1980, in Antwerp, Belgium had indicted the United States-backed
Marcos dictatorship of grave crimes against the Filipino people.
The government of Mrs. Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo has reacted to the filing of
charges by victims of grievous human rights violations with the dismissive
remark of Executive Secretary Eduardo Ermita, a former military general, that
this is again the handiwork of the "leftists" and "militants," with the
Communist Party of the Philippines-New People's Army (CPP-NPA) as the "brains".
Mr. Ermita concludes that this legal action is biased and underhanded, part and
parcel of the general plan to "topple the government and establish communist
rule". This, he said, is the underlying reason behind efforts "to humiliate our
President before an international court".
Let the fair and independent-minded judge for themselves on the basis of two
important objective considerations: First, the charges and the reasons given by
complainants for bringing their case to the Permanent Peoples' Tribunal (PPT);
second, the nature, background and track record of the PPT itself.
The victims of gross human rights violations – summary executions, abductions
and enforced disappearances, torture and massacres -- cry for justice. The
Philippine criminal justice system can offer nothing except systematic cover-up
and outright reprisal against witnesses and aggrieved parties since the
suspected perpetrators are state agents or death squads under their direction,
implementing what Mrs. Arroyo herself announced last June as her regime's policy
of "total war against the Left."
"Total war" is nothing but a policy of annihilation, not just of armed guerillas
waging a thirty seven-year-old armed struggle against the government but legal,
unarmed political and social activists and their supporters. In the era of the
U.S.-designed "war on terror," such state policy and its bloody consequences,
when implemented by states allied to the U.S., are considered in official
circles as completely understandable and justified, not subject to international
law, in particular human rights and international humanitarian law, and met with
silent complicity if not approbation.
The Filipino people -- poor, hungry and miserable, reeling from decades of
economic policy dictates of the U.S.-dominated multilateral agencies such as the
International Monetary Fund and World Bank, and now the World Trade Organization
-- do not see any light at the end of the tunnel. A succession of elite-ruled
governments, albeit claiming to be democratic in contrast to their predecessor,
the Marcos dictatorship, have sustained policy frameworks that work against the
basic interests of the Filipino people, and are lopsidedly in favor of foreign
multinational corporations and banks such as the "honorable debt policy" and
neoliberal doctrines of liberalization, deregulation and privatization. These
pro-imperialist policies are consistently implemented in a blind, servile and
completely callous way. In the era of imperialist "globalization," such
actuations of Third World regimes are applauded by international capital and
justified by economic, political and cultural institutions under its sway.
The Filipino nation, continues to suffer under an unfinished process of
decolonization; in fact, the Philippines is a neocolony of the U.S.. Thus, the
sovereign right of the Filipino people to chart their own destiny according to
their own best lights has effectively been suppressed and undermined by their
erstwhile colonizer with the indispensable help of a series of pro-U.S. domestic
regimes. As a consequence, the country continues to play its assigned role in
U.S. geopolitical strategy and acts as a reliable cog in the superpower's war
machine.
The indisputable proof: despite a constitutional prohibition against the
presence of foreign military installations and troops on Philippine soil,
thousands of U.S. troops freely move in and out of Philippine territory
throughout the year, without so much as a by-your-leave except, presumably,
perfunctory notice to some government functionary or agency.
Thus the complainants have charged the GMA and Bush governments, the IMF, World
Bank and the WTO and selected multinational corporations and banks with
violations of human rights, especially civil and political rights as well as
economic, social and cultural rights, together with violations of the rights to
national self-determination and liberation.
In a time of the U.S.-led "war of terror" in Iraq, Afghanistan, the Balkans and
other sovereign countries resisting US interventionism or that have significant
national liberation movements, the PPT is more than ever relevant as an
"international opinion tribunal, independent from any State authority, which
publicly and analytically examines cases regarding violations of human rights
and rights of peoples."
According to the Lelio Basso Foundation which set up the PPT and has the mandate
to convene it, the complaints are submitted by the victims themselves or groups
representing them. The Tribunal was founded in June 1979 in Italy by law
experts, writers and other intellectuals drawn from all regions in the world.
This tribunal succeeded the Russell Tribunals I and II which had exposed the war
crimes of the 1960s and 1970s committed in Vietnam, and was presided by Bertrand
Russell, then Jean-Paul Sartre and Lelio Basso, a renowned Italian senator.
The PPT has a track record of assembling highly respected, credible, independent
and socially conscious individuals to delve into cases of blatant, widespread,
systematic, state-sponsored/perpetrated violations of human rights,
international law and the rights of nations under the general guidance of the
Universal Declaration of the Rights of Peoples or The Algiers Declaration
adopted in 1976.
The PPT considers it a right and obligation for individuals, as citizens of the
world, to shape, develop and refine international law "in accordance with human
needs and human values."
The member jurors in the PPT First Session on the Philippines stated in their
verdict: "Such an obligation is especially strong in the present historical
period where crimes of state are widespread and intense, go unpublished, and are
often committed in concert with international institutions, especially those
institutions operating in the economic sphere. We refuse to sit idly by and
watch, without attempting to remedy, this accumulating record of official abuse
and institutional repression."
The PPT Second Session indictment shows that the Philippines has not
substantially moved away from political repression and military abuse despite
the ouster of a military-backed, U.S.-propped dictatorship nor has it broken
free of its neocolonial status despite loud proclamations of being an
independent and democratic republic.
GMA and her retinue of apologists ignore the PPT Second session on the
Philippines at their own peril even as their chief backer, the Bush
administration, is clearly on the way to being a lame duck president that
rightly deserves the American people's rejection in the coming November mid-term
U.S. polls as well as being consigned to the garbage heap of history, earning
the world peoples' scorn and lasting condemnation.
*Published in Business World
3-4 November 2006
© 2006 Bulatlat ■ Alipato Media Center
Permission is granted to reprint or redistribute this article, provided its author/s and Bulatlat are properly credited and notified.