This story
was taken from Bulatlat, the Philippines's alternative weekly
newsmagazine (www.bulatlat.com, www.bulatlat.net, www.bulatlat.org).
Vol. VI, No. 12, April 30-May 6, 2006
SC
declares CPR unconstitutional
Protesters File Charges vs.
PNP
Protesters filed criminal
charges against high-ranking officers and elements of the Philippine National
Police (PNP). This follows the Supreme Court decision declaring the calibrated
preemptive response (CPR) policy as unconstitutional.
BY EMILY VITAL
Bulatlat
Protesters filed criminal charges against
high-ranking officers and elements of the Philippine National Police (PNP). This
follows the Supreme Court decision declaring the calibrated preemptive response
(CPR) policy as unconstitutional.
President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo imposed the
CPR in September last year in the wake of street demonstrations calling for her
resignation or ouster. The PNP used the CPR as basis for violently dispersing
rallies causing injury to scores of demonstrators.
Unconstitutional
The 13-0 verdict against the controversial
presidential directive was released April 25, less than a week after the high
tribunal decided against Executive Order No. 464.
The SC decision states, “…the use of the term
(CPR) should now be discontinued, since it does not mean anything other than the
maximum tolerance policy set forth in B.P. No. 880.”
The SC defined “maximum tolerance” as the
highest degree of restraint that the military, police and other peace-keeping
authorities shall observe during a public assembly or in the dispersal of the
same.
Abuses
The charges filed against the PNP were in
violation of the Batas Pambansa Blg. 880, Republic Act No. 7438, and the Revised
Penal Code.
RA 7438 refers to the Miranda Doctrine or rights
of those arrested to be informed of their rights, to remain silent, and to have
a counsel of their choice. Also cited were provisions in the Revised Penal Code
against unlawful arrest (Art. 269), arbitrary detention (Art. 124), maltreatment
of detention prisoner (Art. 235), grave threats (Art. 282), acts of
lasciviousness (Art. 336), and physical injuries (Arts. 265-266).
Five cases were included in the charges. The
incidents cited happened on Oct. 4 and Oct. 6 last year and April 6 this year.
Included in the respondents are PNP chief Gen.
Arturo Lomibao, National Capital Region Police Office (NCRPO) chief Gen. Vidal
Querol and Western Police District (WPD) chief Gen. Pedro Bulaong.
Alfonso Cinco IV, counsel for the complainants,
said that Generals Lomibao, Querol and Bulaong are charged for ordering the
dispersals of the rallies. Cinco said that the violations were committed by the
PNP with their knowledge, consent and approval. Cinco cited as abuses the
non-wearing of nameplates and the carrying of firearms within 100 meters of the
rally.
Victims
“The police exercised no restraint at all. They
used the CPR as a license to intensify their abuses against the protesters,”
said Paolo Oliveros, one of the complainants and member of the public
information department of the Bagong Alyansang Makabayan (Bayan or New Patriotic
Alliance).
Video footages showed Oliveros being dragged by
four policemen during the Oct. 4 rally at the Don Chino Roces Bridge (formerly
Mendiola Bridge) in Manila, a few meters from the presidential palace.
Another complainant, Fajima Tajar, said, “Those
accountable must pay for what they did. It torments me that I could not even
identify those who attacked me because they did not have their nameplates.”
Tajar, a member of Karapatan-National Capital
Region, was slapped on the face by a policeman. Another policeman touched
sensitive parts of her body when she was arrested in the Oct. 4 rally. Video
clips showed this incident in detail.
No remorse
In another news report, Justice Secretary Raul
Gonzales was quoted as warning protesters against testing the government’s
resolve to quell unruly crowds during the Labor Day protests.
Gonzalez said Arroyo can revive Presidential
Proclamation No. 1017 or the declaration of a state of national emergency if
rallies become as “unruly” as the Labor Day protests in 2003.
May 1
Meanwhile, Renato Reyes Jr., Bayan
secretary-general said: “The scrapping of the CPR is timely as the May 1 protest
approaches. The PNP and even the Armed Forces of the Philippines (AFP) will have
no reason to disperse our peaceful actions. We are on a high moral and legal
ground to assert our right to free assembly.”
Reyes said the Labor Day protest will serve as a
litmus test to the junking of the CPR.
The Kilusang Mayo Uno (KMU or May 1st
Movement) and Bayan will lead the protest at the Liwasang Bonifacio on May 1.
“What we have is a fake president implementing
unconstitutional policies,” Reyes added. Bulatlat © 2006 Bulatlat
■
Alipato Publications Permission is granted to reprint or redistribute this article, provided its author/s and Bulatlat are properly credited and notified.
In an interview over DZMM last week,
PNP spokesperson S/Supt. Samuel Pagdilao Jr. said they will not release a public
apology to the protesters.