This story
was taken from Bulatlat, the Philippines's alternative weekly
newsmagazine (www.bulatlat.com, www.bulatlat.net, www.bulatlat.org).
Vol. V, No. 50, January 29-February 4, 2006
New VAT Eats
into Consumers’ Already Scanty Budget The
first stage of the new Value-Added Tax law – an expansion of its coverage –
could not but bring about an increase in the prices of socially sensitive food
products. As this is being written, the VAT rate is set to be increased to 12
percent from the present 10 percent in a few days. BY
ALEXANDER MARTIN REMOLLINO
With the
percentage of the Value-Added Tax (VAT) set to be increased this February from
10 to 12 percent, the country’s consumers are now understandably at a loss on
figuring out how to stretch their dwindling budgets.
The increase in
the VAT rate from 10 percent to 12 percent was one of eight revenue measures
pushed by President Gloria Macapagal-Arroyo in 2004, when the country was hit by
a fiscal crisis. Congress instead passed last year the restructured VAT (RVAT)
law increasing VAT coverage to include oil, power, and transportation. However,
the new RVAT law also grants Macapagal-Arroyo standby authority to increase the
VAT rate from 10 percent to 12 percent in February. The bill took effect on Nov.
1, 2005.
As things were,
most Filipino consumers were already having a hard time coping with skyrocketing
prices of goods and services before the coverage was expanded. The expansion of
VAT coverage caused a further reduction in their budgets.
Already covered
before RVAT took effect were: food products (processed meat, canned fish,
coconut and vegetable oil, bakery products, noodles, milk, dairy products,
coffee, sugar); clothing, footwear, tannery and leather products; drugs and
medicine, furniture, pulp and paper; glass and glass products; cement, steel,
iron, wood and most construction materials; electrical lamps and equipment;
machinery and equipment both for manufacturing and agriculture; wholesale trade
and retail trade; pawnshops; restaurants, cafes and other eating and drinking
places; employment and recruitment agencies; motion picture production; hotels
and motels; and telecommunications (including landline, post-paid and pre-paid
mobile phone services).
Bulatlat
did the rounds of a number of supermarkets and variety stores and noted down the
average prices of food products particularly known to be socially sensitive. A
comparison between prices before and after Nov. 1, 2005 revealed increases that
give consumers just cause for worry.
Prices
Before Nov. 1
Since Nov. 1
white sugar
P35.00/kg ($0.67)
P36.85/kg ($0.70)
brown sugar
29.00/kg ($0.55)
30.00/kg ($0.57)
washed sugar
30.00/kg ($0.57)
31.50/kg ($0.60)
instant pancit canton
5.00/pack ($0.09)
5.85/pack ($0.11)
instant noodles
4.75/pack ($0.09)
5.00/pack ($0.09)
sardines
9.75/can ($0.19)
10.50/can ($0.20)
eggs
49.75/dozen ($0.95)
52.75/dozen ($1.07)
vinegar
7.00/340-ml bottle ($0.13)
7.55/340-ml bottle ($0.14)
A few days after
RVAT took effect, Vice President Noli de Castro was photographed in the
newspapers and seen on television doing the rounds of public markets and
monitoring prices. Likewise the Department of Trade and Industry (DTI) issued a
number of statements saying the RVAT implementation did not have to result in
significant price increases, as it merely expanded the coverage and did not yet
raise the VAT rate.
But De Castro and
the DTI both missed the point. The first stage of the new VAT law could not but
bring about an increase in the prices of the food products listed above.
Oil and power are
indispensable in the processing and packaging of goods. Production costs are
included in the prices of goods, as are transportation costs. Since the VAT law
in its first stage included oil, power and transportation in the tax coverage,
price increases as a result of RVAT should come as no surprise.
As this is being
written, the VAT rate is set to be increased to 12 percent from the present 10
percent in a few days.
Macapagal-Arroyo
aggressively promoted the RVAT as a revenue measure supposedly to stave off the
fiscal crisis that hit the country in 2004. The RVAT was the centerpiece of the
tax reform program of the Arroyo administration and its most important revenue
generating measure.
Those opposed
pointed out that instead of raising the tax burden of the people the government
could have reviewed the tax exemptions being provided large corporations
amounting to around P229.1 billion ($4.373 billion) in potential revenues in
2003 alone according to Former Finance Secretary Juanita Amatong; reduction of
tariffs costing the government losses of up to P100 billion ($1.9 billion) a
year by Ibon Foundation estimates; plugging tax leakages amounting to P215
billion ($4.1 billion) to P285 billion ($5.4 billion) in lost revenues; and
cracking down on corruption that siphons out 20 to 30 percent of the national
budget based on a study by the National Tax Research Center.
Meanwhile,
December 2005 data from the National Wages and Productivity Commission (NWPC)
show that the living wage for a family of six, the average Filipino family, now
stands at a national average of P619.20. In contrast, the daily minimum wage is
currently pegged at a national average of only P222.29.
The Macapagal-Arroyo
government has been snubbing calls for wage increases while prices of prime
commodities continuously jack up. And now, with the impending increase in VAT
rates, another wave of price increases is in the offing. That would further
widen the gap between the family living wage and the daily minimum wage.
Bulatlat © 2006 Bulatlat
■
Alipato Publications Permission is granted to reprint or redistribute this article, provided its author/s and Bulatlat are properly credited and notified.
Bulatlat